Posts Tagged cesarean prevention

More Thoughts on You Can’t Get There From Here

I’m about to post on my group blog about a topic that’s currently become more public, pit to distress.  It’s a protocol by which basically pitocin use is abused and a baby is deliberately distressed to the point that the ‘miracle’ cesarean is recommended in order to ‘save your baby.’

Pitocin is most likely to be introduced to you as a means to either induce your labor, an additional medical protocol to induce your labor (you may have a prostaglandin gel on your cervix first, pitocin added via IV later) or as a means to speeding up your labor.  Pitocin is a synthetic version of the human hormone oxytocin.

No doubt there will be many L&D practitioners who will deny they abuse oxytocin.  Ask them what their protocol is: what is the dosage, how often is it increased, how likely are they to turn it off once your contractions reach an established pattern and what is their definition of a good contraction pattern?  Most likely the answers they give you will actually constitute abuse of pitocin.  They just don’t know that they’re abusing pitocin because they are simply doing what they were taught to do by people whom they trusted and believed they had no reason to question what they were learning.

I would never tell parents that all obstetricians are bad and all midwives are wonderful.  That would be a lie benefitting no one, least of all the mothers and their babies.  Instead, I will tell you that you must keep an open mind and learn to ask questions.  You can best learn how to ask the right questions when you learn about the topic you’re inquiring of, that is why I posed the questions above as a sample of what you can ask your careprovider about their use of pitocin.

If you, like many mothers, are planning to push your baby out of your body under your own power by having the freedom to use different positions for second stage then you need to learn about natural labor in first stage.  If you, like many mothers, are planning to hold your newborn baby for at least an hour after birth, then you need to learn about natural labor in first stage.  If you, like many mothers, are planning to delay cord clamping until either the cord stops pulsating or you’ve delivered your placenta naturally, then you need to learn about natural labor in first stage.

Inductions will put your first stage of labor on a very different flowchart for labor progress.  Ultimately it can turn your birth plans into fodder for a good fire in the winter.  Remember there are wise birth practitioners out there.  Have the courage to find a wise one whose comfort level with birth makes your birth plans theirs, not vice versa.  Have an abnormal first stage labor and you raise the odds of giving permission to become an un-necesarean statistic.

Leave a Comment

Cesarean Prevention Starts at Home

I am so grateful to be able to cyber-sit with women and birth advocates around the world at all hours.  The birth wisdom we share is in turn shared with the women in our own communities.  We encourage each other to continue to speak up and tell what we know.  

It is this woman powered effort that provided the support and incentive to prepare a report on the state of maternal and newborn outcomes in America, Home Birth: The Gold Standard for Cesarean Prevention.  This report is available globally as a part of a documents resource library.  In addition, we prepared an outreach document for distribution to our government who is currently keen on health care reform.   Great health care begins with meeting the UN Millennium Project Goal 5: Improve Maternal Health.  A global issue is your local issue.  It’s a small world.

Please download then distribute either or both of the above documents to your legislators.  We believe they are willing to listen but the medical lobbyists’ attempts to drown us out are often more successful.

Leave a Comment

Behind the Numbers: Truth About Maternal & Infant Mortality in the U.S.

We have the means with which to ensure healthier and happier birth experiences for both mothers and babies.  Unfortunately, most practitioners are too busy to read the news, the research or surf the web for the most up-to-date information on birth care change.  

A benefit was recently held to raise funds for a little girl whose facial nerves were injured during a forceps delivery.  Forceps injuries are not uncommon.  Reading about them in the news is.  Why?  A comment from a colleague seeking to start a birth circle in her community provided some insight.  It seems that a first birth information evening was met with some caution as some mothers were uncomfortable with the picture of cesarean as a medical intervention to be avoided.  So much was their aversion that my colleague’s co-host thought perhaps they should ‘pretty up’ the birth message.  

I do know that health practitioners also seek ways to ‘soften’ the risks message.  Unfortunately, ‘softening’ leads to the omission of important information.  It may be scary to hear a risk of cesarean delivery is death during the procedure itself or afterwards (i.e. embolism or a baby that is born too early and not able to live outside the womb).  That is not a good reason to not let mothers know death is a risk of cesarean surgery.  It’s scary to hear epidural catheters have been placed as to paralyze a woman’s heart and/or lungs causing death.  That’s not a good reason to not tell a woman there are risks involved with epidural use beyond that of the drugs themselves.

A large scale global debate on the reporting of the U.S. ranking poorly in Maternal and Infant Mortality rates is of no help in promoting truth in informed consent.  The red herring is the definition of mortality as it relates to birth.  The definition has little to do with how correct the vital statistics reports are.  

The U.S.’s world rank in mother and infant mortality is worse than reported and the current ‘debate’ regarding the definitions of birth mortality rates actually serves to make the U.S. look better.  The advances in technology do not serve any of the main causes of maternal and infant mortalities anywhere in the world, much less our home country.

…the CDC reported the MMR in 1983 as 8.0/100,000.  The inquiry into the misclassification on birth certificates from 1977 to 1984 shows the rate actually to be 10.9/100,000, a difference of almost 3 percent.  The CDC finds that the problem persists into 1996, stating, “In this report, maternal mortality ratios are based solely on vital statistics data and are underestimates because of misclassification. The number of deaths attributed to pregnancy and its complications is estimated to be 1.3 to three times that reported in vital statistics records. ~ Home Birth: The Gold Standard of Cesarean Prevention

Leave a Comment

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.